Not Waving But Drowning: UN Agenda 21 and the Designer Floods of Britain

You may be only just now waking up and rubbing the sleep out of your eyes to the news that the recent flooding of Britain is the result of EU policies to deliberately create wetlands in the UK ….. and that is shocking enough. For some, it’s been about as traumatic as when you discover that Father Christmas is actually your Dad. So then, to have to go on to learn that these EU directives are being driven by something deeply sinister, known as UN Agenda 21, may be more than you can take.  If so, please don’t worry. Go and have a lie down…. but bookmark this page first, so that you can return later, hopefully with a nice of mug of tea and a chocolate biscuit, because this is really growing up time now.

I first started researching about UN Agenda 21 a couple of years ago. I came the view, then, that it was about nothing more or less than a blueprint for global slavery, and I haven’t changed my mind since. In fact, I can see it now being played out in front of my eyes in my own life, like a car crash in slow motion.

Are you sitting comfortably?

I’d like to start off with a story, a metaphor if you like, to help make something quite complex easier to understand, and it goes something like this:

The Ramayana is an ancient and even today, extremely popular myth of the Indian people which contains great tales of derring-do by its heroes the sun god, Rama, and the monkey god, Hanuman. Like all myths, its stories are metaphors for deeper philosophical teachings, but it is the battle scene between the sun god Rama and the evil serpent Ravana that I want to highlight here.

During the first few hours of pitched battle, Rama is losing badly. This is because Ravana has more than a thousand heads, and every time one of Rama’s arrows slices off one of Ravana’s heads, another grows in its place. Rama is becoming exhausted and in danger of losing the battle. But eventually, he is given wise counsel by a shaman. The shaman tells Rama that he has to hit Ravana in his ‘nectar pot’, which is just below the navel. So when Rama fires his arrow in that direction, and it hits Ravana’s nectar pot, the thousand-headed serpent falls instantly dead to the ground.
floods ravana

In this metaphor, the thousand-headed serpent Ravana represents the United Nations programme, Agenda 21. The heads that keep growing back again are all the different planks of the implementation of this program ~ and they include geoengineering (chemtrails), HAARP, genetically modified foods, the man-made global warming scam, fracking, biological terrorism, atmospheric terrorism and financial terrorism.

All of these programs solely exist as various planks to support Agenda 21 and so it’s a complete waste of time arguing with each of them, individually. In any case,  our government-run media has an unending supply of talking heads to role out and tie up the real scientists with their propaganda science and ridiculous computer models.

Similarly, our government will feel totally justified in continuing to try to convince ordinary people that geo-engineering (chemtrails) is needed to protect us from global warming (while pretending that they’re only seeking permission to spray and not actually doing so) and that genetically modified foods are needed to feed the “population explosion” when they have patently never given a toss about the world’s starving millions before, otherwise why inflict on them such restrictive trade barriers and march into their countries and strip them of all their assets?

Added to that, even the UN’s own conservative demographic models show that the world’s population will level off by 2050 (which means, it will probably level off way before that). The sole purpose of Agenda 21 is to remove our property rights and to drive us back into a feudal system, which is a euphemism for slavery. Under Agenda 21, all the land would be owned by the United Nations and administered by its own appointed committees.

In short, we will have to pay to live on this Earth.

The official report of the UN-funded Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood, calls for placing “the global commons” under the direct authority of the UN Trusteeship Council, and defines “global commons” to be:

“The atmosphere, outer space, the oceans beyond national jurisdiction and the related environment and life-support systems that contribute to the support of human life.”

Moreover, the UN Trusteeship Council is to be selected from “civil society” representatives. The Commission on Global Governance also calls for the creation of a new “Petitions Council” which would receive petitions from “Stakeholder Councils” in each nation for the purpose of directing the petitions to the correct UN agency for resolution and enforcement actions.

(Read more in The UN and Property Rights, © Copyright 1997 Henry Lamb.)

These ‘Stakeholder Councils”, by the way, are unelected NGOs, appointed by UN bodies, and they already exist in our local neighbourhoods. Our Global Neighbourhood is the usual oxymoronic twisted doublespeak that comes out of these committees and is propagated throughout the mainstream media by further unelected ‘opinion formers and leaders’ such as Common Purpose.

David Cameron’s Big Society, following as it does Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, is another example of an unelected “Third Way” which is taking over the running of our towns and cities in Britain. Baroness Young, whose idea it was to flood the Somerset Levels without first warning, let alone asking, the people who live there, is typical of this new breed of unelected interfering busybody. As she famously told a House of Lords Select Committee, when questioned about her intentions for the Somerset Levels:

“To be frank…. if in 2015 we do a survey of the British public and there is even a minor proportion of them who can utter the words “Water Framework Directive”, I shall put a bullet through my head! It will have been the wrong thing to tell them. We want to tell them about outcomes, not about the processes.”

Now that we all know about the Water Framework Directive – not to mention the Habitats Directive, the Environmental Impact Assessment and the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive – we can see that the flooding is the result of deliberate policy, mandated by EU law.

We now know that these have been “designer floods”, made to order.

All of the EU directives are just the different measures used in Brussels to toe the line of UN Agenda 21, which has the aim of moving people into the cities from the countryside. Flooding the land would be a great way to achieve this … and then once the people are moved, and the farmers bankrupted and uninsurable, the land could be recovered and then sold on.

Why do we think that there’s a deliberate agenda to flood parts of Britain? Well, there are many indicators in how our elected leaders act… like pretending to care about protecting us from flooding while acting in the opposite way.

For instance, the Environment Secretary Owen Paterson has been offering compensation (well, bribes really) to farmers to get them to cut down their trees. This will help to exacerbate the flooding no end … because not only do tree roots hold the soil together, but from tests we know that water drains 60 times more quickly from the land when it can go down tree roots.

Another example is the algorithm that the government uses to determine which parts of the country receives flood defence funding. For every pound given from its central pot, £8.00 of business benefits need to be realised. This calculation ‘just so happens’ to massively favour urban centres over rural populations.

Other indicators are found in the blatant dishonesty that has surrounded the whole sorry mess. I once heard a very wise old woman say “Figures lie, and liars figure,” and nowhere has this been more apparent than in the way that the Environment Agency has appeared to mis-manage its role. A stunning example was provided to Richard North, the environmental journalist that initially broke the EU connection to the flooding, by one of his Drainage Board sources.

Richard said:

“To dredge a 1.2-mile section of the Parrett, they got a quote of £7,500. For five miles dredging of the same river, the Environment Agency claims it will cost £4 million. By then assessing the economic cost of flooding agricultural land as zero, it is then very easy to show that flood prevention is not “cost effective”.

Then there’s the dishonesty of the Met Office… and I hardly know where to begin with all that. Maybe it’s another article, in itself… but here’s just a couple of its more recent attempts to try to manufacture our consent that the flooding is all the fault of “global warming”.

The claims it makes in its recent report called “The Recent Storms and Floods in the UK” would lead one to believe that the waters round these Blessed Isles were totally independent from the oceans in the rest of the world.  The report not only blithely ignores the fact that the climate hasn’t warmed for about 15 years, but it also reckons that said ‘global warming’ will cause the North Sea, the Channel and the Irish Sea to rise three times higher than the seas in the rest of the world by 2030.

From page 21:

“With the warming we are already committed to over the next few decades, a further 11-16cm of sea level rise is likely by 2030. This equates to 23-27cm of total sea level rise since 1900. We are very confident that sea level will continue to rise over coming decades as the planet continues to warm. These numbers represent our current best estimate for the UK.”

Even the Summary for Policymakers, part of the report for the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC), and which is always notoriously warmist, has only managed to squeeze from its computer models a number three times lower than that. (See picture below). The SPM is working on a 3mm rise a year, while our Met Office, in its wisdom, has decided to triple it to 9mm a year.

floods - SPM

Added to which, a piece of very good research by consultant hydrologist, Dr Colin Clark, who bases his conclusions on Met Office precipitation figures going back to the 18th century, puts this current wet January into perspective and shows that these rains and storms are not that unusual, and more importantly, not linked to air temperature (aka ‘global warming’).

floods precipitation

All of these liars figuring and figures lying, of course, is to justify why the flooding that we’re suffering from is not because of serious and criminal negligence in maintaining anti-flooding infrastructure that had previously worked perfectly well for centuries. Meanwhile, we will have to put up with our seas being three times higher than everyone else’s … in this Mad Hatter’s Tea Party world.

Floods teaparty

However, it’s not a Mad Hatter’s Tea Party – it’s deadly serious. I think it’s time to stop laughing at their seeming incompetence, when they know exactly what they’re doing. Maybe we’ve all got a bit too comfortable with enjoying each other’s company in the cheap seats, throwing popcorn and smart ass critiques at the clowns on the stage. Maybe, in this way, our egos are trapping us from seeing what would be clearer if we just stopped treating our politicians like characters performing in a theatre of the absurd, and realise what they’re really up to.

We can laugh all we like, at their so-called incompetence… and they don’t mind… because they are laughing back at us… all the way to the bank. They are not doing what they tell us they’re doing… which is why we keep yelling at them that they’re going the wrong way. They’re going in exactly the right way that they want to go, towards implementing Agenda 21, while telling us something else entirely. There is no other reasonable explanation, in my opinion.

Their wrong-headed concept of Agenda 21 is born from the idea that the Earth needs to be protected from its enemy, and that enemy is man himself. Those that crafted Agenda 21 have already set in motion plans to protect themselves from the enemy (us) in case we give them any trouble as they begin to implement it.

That’s why in the US already, anyone can be locked up in indefinite detention in a FEMA camp, and why there will soon be hundreds of armed spy drone planes patrolling the skies. That’s why there are spiders networks of underground military bunkers underneath many of the major cities.

All of this ~ along with the chemtrails, genetically modified food, fracking, flooding and vaccine programmes ~ is there to support the implementation of Agenda 21, which cannot be stopped unless the United Nations is stopped.

But surely, some will say, the United Nations is sacrosanct … it is our only chance for peace on Earth, this federation of nation states that we brought together after the League of Nations failed. It’s true, we were told that with the United Nations, we will never have to face a war like World War 2 again.

However, have a look at this map of US wars and CIA “interventions” since World War 2.

It doesn’t even include Mozambique, Namibia, and Honduras. But still, this map gives the lie to the urban myth that the world is a more peaceful place since the establishment of the United Nations. This could hardly be possible, anyway, when the controlling voice on its Security Council is the world’s most dangerous terrorist, the United States of America, who, along with its lapdog, the United Kingdom, is sabre rattling for World War 3 in the Middle East even as we speak.

So at the very least, we can clearly see that the United Nations has failed as a peacekeeping body. I can’t even begin to list here the harm to the world that the United Nations has done in other respects, from its subsidiaries like the World Bank and the World Trade Organisation.

So in my opinion, if we really want an end to designer flooding, chemtrails, genetically-modified foods, financial terrorism, biological terrorism, atmospheric terrorism, carbon taxes, false flag events and wars, we need to withdraw our support from efforts engaged in destroying the thousands of talking heads and, instead, concentrate our arrows of dissent on the one belly of the Beast, the nectar pot, aka Agenda 21 and the United Nations.

Not waving but drowning

Nobody heard him, the dead man,
But still he lay moaning:
I was much further out than you thought
And not waving but drowning.

Poor chap, he always loved larking
And now he’s dead
It must have been too cold for him his heart gave way,
They said.

Oh, no no no, it was too cold always
(Still the dead one lay moaning)
I was much too far out all my life
And not waving but drowning.

Stevie Smith



Reclaiming Sovereignty

Shamanic Earth Magic

 Amazon cover

Buy it here

When the people of Britain voted to leave the European Union in June 2016, the word on everyone’s lips was Sovereignty.

But what is Sovereignty?

There were some who tried to convince the British people that Sovereignty didn’t really exist, or that if it did, it was over-rated. A few self-styled experts claimed that Sovereignty could be extended or pooled; others insisted that Sovereignty was merely “the ability to get things done.”

All of those pundits were wrong – although they were hardly to blame for their errors. Sovereignty actually starts off life as a spiritual transmission from the spirits of the land, but this is no longer taught to the general populace.

However, a few mystic types did know about Sovereignty, and so they weren’t at all surprised when its spirit rose up from the land on the Summer Solstice of 2016, and infused the hearts and minds of the ordinary people of Britain.

In this book, Reclaiming Sovereignty, you will learn all about the spiritual source of Sovereignty – and how to find it and reclaim it in your own life and on your own land.

Buy Reclaiming Sovereignty: Shamanic Earth Magic here